Friday, 3 January 2020

sequences and series - Does sumin=1nftyfrac1phi(n)s have a euler product?



Does n=11ϕ(n)s



have a euler product and functional equation? ϕ(n) is the euler phi function.



Since ϕ(n) is multiplicative I think the series could have a euler product and functional equation.




n=11ϕ(n)s=n=1a(n)ns



where a(n) is sequence https://oeis.org/A058277 in the OEIS.






I did some research and found many relations between the zeta function and other special functions such as:



n=1ϕ(n)ns=ζ(s1)ζ(s).


Answer




Firstly, ϕ(pk)=pk(11p)k1, prime p



Define f(k)=ϕ(k)s.



For the moment, consider the set of integers SN={k|k=pa11pa22paNN,a()1}.



Then,
kSNf(k)=aN=1a1=1[pa11paNN(11p1)(11p1)]s=(Ni=1111/pi)sNj=1aj=1pajsj=Ni=1(11/pi)spsi1



Define fi:=(11/pi)spsi1



Now we want to find

kSNf(k) where SN={k|k=pa11paNN,a()0}



Summing f(k) over all the elements in SN with aα=0 and other indexes non-zero gives 1fαNi=1fi.



How about having two zero indexes aα,aβ? 1fαfβNi=1fi.
Three?
1fαfβfγNi=1fi.



Summing all these and factorizing naturally give
kSNf(k)=(1+1f1)(1+1f2)(1+1fN)Ni=1fi=Ni=1(1+fi)




Taking the limit N, we find that
n=11ϕ(n)s=prime p(1+(11/p)sps1)



I am still working on the functional equation. It is clear that the function is holomorphic on Re s>1, and is likely to have a pole at s=1, as plugging in s=1 gives p(1+1p)=.



A few more words on analytic continuation:



Obviously,
F(s):=n=11ϕ(n)s=prime p(1+(11/p)sps1)=p11psp[1ps+(p1)s]=ζ(s)p[1ps+(p1)s]G(s)




  1. G(s) converges for Re s>0, as 1ps+(p1)s=1+sps1+O(ps2).

  2. Therefore, F(s) has a simple pole at s=1 due to zeta function. The residue there equals Ress=1F(s)=p(1+1p(p1))=315ζ(3)2π4

    (See Landau’s totient constant.)

  3. lims0+G(s)=1 This can be seen by plugging in s=0 into the above expression.

  4. Let's look at G(0).
    G(s)G(s)=ppslnp(p1)sln(p1)1ps+(p1)s
    G(0)=G(0)pln(11p)=
    As G(0) is finite and G(0) is not, this suggests that 0 is a branch point of F(s). Thus, meromorphic continuation is not possible.







Further analysis shows that Re s=0 is the natural boundary of F(s).



Firstly, by means of successive series expansion, we obtain
\begin{align} \ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s}) &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{\left[p^{-s}-(p-1)^{-s}\right]^n}{n} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{1}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr p^{-s(n-r)}(-1)^r(p-1)^{-sr} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{p^{-ns}}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr (-1)^r\left(1-\frac1p\right)^{-sr} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{p^{-ns}}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr (-1)^r\sum^\infty_{k=0}\binom{-sr}{k}\frac{(-1)^k}{p^k} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\sum^\infty_{k=0}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\frac1{p^{k+ns}} \end{align}



where \alpha_{n,k}(s)=\frac{(-1)^k}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr \binom{-sr}{k}



Furthermore, notice that
\alpha_{n,0}(s)=\frac1n\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr=0



Therefore,
\ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s})=\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\frac1{p^{k+ns}}

\begin{align} \implies \ln G(s) &=\sum_p \ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s}) \\ &=\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\zeta_{\mathbb P}(k+ns) \\ \end{align}
where \zeta_{\mathbb P} is the prime zeta function.



It is well known that \zeta_{\mathbb P} has the natural boundary \text{Re }s=0, because \mathcal S (the set of singularities of \zeta_{\mathbb P}) clusters on the imaginary axis. Hence, obviously G(s) cannot be analytically continued across \text{Re }s=0. A functional equation does not exist.




Meanwhile, we obtained a representation of F(s) in terms of well-known functions:




\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac1{\phi(n)^s} =\zeta(s)\exp\left[\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\zeta_{\mathbb P}(k+ns)\right]
\alpha_{n,k}(s)=\frac{(-1)^k}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr \binom{-sr}{k}



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...