Does ∞∑n=11ϕ(n)s
have a euler product and functional equation? ϕ(n) is the euler phi function.
Since ϕ(n) is multiplicative I think the series could have a euler product and functional equation.
∞∑n=11ϕ(n)s=∞∑n=1a(n)ns
where a(n) is sequence https://oeis.org/A058277 in the OEIS.
I did some research and found many relations between the zeta function and other special functions such as:
∞∑n=1ϕ(n)ns=ζ(s−1)ζ(s).
Answer
Firstly, ϕ(pk)=pk(1−1p)k≥1, prime p
Define f(k)=ϕ(k)−s.
For the moment, consider the set of integers SN={k|k=pa11pa22⋯paNN,a(⋅)≥1}.
Then,
∑k∈SNf(k)=∞∑aN=1⋯∞∑a1=1[pa11⋯paNN(1−1p1)⋯(1−1p1)]−s=(N∏i=111−1/pi)s⋅N∏j=1∞∑aj=1p−ajsj=N∏i=1(1−1/pi)−spsi−1
Define fi:=(1−1/pi)−spsi−1
Now we want to find
∑k∈S∗Nf(k) where S∗N={k|k=pa11⋯paNN,a(⋅)≥0}
Summing f(k) over all the elements in S∗N with aα=0 and other indexes non-zero gives 1fαN∏i=1fi.
How about having two zero indexes aα,aβ? 1fαfβN∏i=1fi.
Three?
1fαfβfγN∏i=1fi.
Summing all these and factorizing naturally give
∑k∈S∗Nf(k)=(1+1f1)(1+1f2)⋯(1+1fN)⋅N∏i=1fi=N∏i=1(1+fi)
Taking the limit N→∞, we find that
∞∑n=11ϕ(n)s=∏prime p(1+(1−1/p)−sps−1)
I am still working on the functional equation. It is clear that the function is holomorphic on Re s>1, and is likely to have a pole at s=1, as plugging in s=1 gives ∏p(1+1p)=∞.
A few more words on analytic continuation:
Obviously,
F(s):=∞∑n=11ϕ(n)s=∏prime p(1+(1−1/p)−sps−1)=∏p11−p−s⋅∏p[1−p−s+(p−1)−s]=ζ(s)⋅∏p[1−p−s+(p−1)−s]⏟G(s)
- G(s) converges for Re s>0, as 1−p−s+(p−1)−s=1+sp−s−1+O(p−s−2).
- Therefore, F(s) has a simple pole at s=1 due to zeta function. The residue there equals Ress=1F(s)=∏p(1+1p(p−1))=315ζ(3)2π4
(See Landau’s totient constant.) - lims→0+G(s)=1 This can be seen by plugging in s=0 into the above expression.
- Let's look at G′(0).
G′(s)G(s)=∑pp−slnp−(p−1)−sln(p−1)1−p−s+(p−1)−s
G′(0)=−G(0)∑pln(1−1p)=∞
As G(0) is finite and G′(0) is not, this suggests that 0 is a branch point of F(s). Thus, meromorphic continuation is not possible.
Further analysis shows that Re s=0 is the natural boundary of F(s).
Firstly, by means of successive series expansion, we obtain
\begin{align} \ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s}) &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{\left[p^{-s}-(p-1)^{-s}\right]^n}{n} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{1}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr p^{-s(n-r)}(-1)^r(p-1)^{-sr} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{p^{-ns}}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr (-1)^r\left(1-\frac1p\right)^{-sr} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{p^{-ns}}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}\binom nr (-1)^r\sum^\infty_{k=0}\binom{-sr}{k}\frac{(-1)^k}{p^k} \\ &=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\sum^\infty_{k=0}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\frac1{p^{k+ns}} \end{align}
where \alpha_{n,k}(s)=\frac{(-1)^k}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr \binom{-sr}{k}
Furthermore, notice that
\alpha_{n,0}(s)=\frac1n\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr=0
Therefore,
\ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s})=\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\frac1{p^{k+ns}}
\begin{align} \implies \ln G(s) &=\sum_p \ln(1-p^{-s}+(p-1)^{-s}) \\ &=\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\zeta_{\mathbb P}(k+ns) \\ \end{align}
where \zeta_{\mathbb P} is the prime zeta function.
It is well known that \zeta_{\mathbb P} has the natural boundary \text{Re }s=0, because \mathcal S (the set of singularities of \zeta_{\mathbb P}) clusters on the imaginary axis. Hence, obviously G(s) cannot be analytically continued across \text{Re }s=0. A functional equation does not exist.
Meanwhile, we obtained a representation of F(s) in terms of well-known functions:
\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac1{\phi(n)^s} =\zeta(s)\exp\left[\sum_{(n,k)\in\mathbb N^2}\alpha_{n,k}(s)\zeta_{\mathbb P}(k+ns)\right]
\alpha_{n,k}(s)=\frac{(-1)^k}{n}\sum^n_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom nr \binom{-sr}{k}
No comments:
Post a Comment