Monday, 2 October 2017

complex analysis - Sum of sines sumnk=0sin(phi+kalpha)



I've got the following problem. I'd like to prove that
nk=0sin(ϕ+kα)=sin(n+12)α+sin(ϕ+nα2)sinα2 Can you help me? I tried writing sines using complex numbers (that sinx=eixeix2i), but it only made the calcuations more difficult... May somebody show me how to solve this problem? I'd be grateful.


Answer



I might be wrong but I think there might be a mistake in your first post : see my answer below. The main idea here is (eiθ)=sin(θ) ((z) denotes the imaginary part of z). Using this idea, you get :




nk=0sin(ϕ+kα)=(nk=0exp(iϕ+ikα)).



Let's work on nk=0exp(iϕ+ikα). Let's assume that α2πZ. You have :



nk=0exp(iϕ+ikα)=exp(iϕ)nk=0exp(ikα)=exp(iϕ)1exp(i(n+1)α)1exp(iα)=exp(iϕ)exp(in+12α)[exp(in+12α)exp(in+12α)]exp(iα2)[exp(iα2)exp(iα2)]=exp(iϕ)exp(inα2)sin(n+12α)sin(α2)=exp(iϕ+inα2)sin(n+12α)sin(α2).



So,



(nk=0exp(iϕ+ikα))=[exp(iϕ+inα2)sin(n+12α)sin(α2)]=sin(ϕ+nα2)sin(n+12α)sin(α2).




Therefore, if α2πZ,



nk=0sin(ϕ+kα)=sin(ϕ+nα2)sin(n+12α)sin(α2).



And if α2πZ,




nk=0sin(ϕ+kα)=nk=0sin(ϕ)=(n+1)sin(ϕ).



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...