Wednesday, 11 October 2017

real analysis - Showing the existence of a continuous, strictly increasing function f on mathbbR such that f(x)=0 almost everywhere




Problem: Show that there exists a continuous strictly increasing function f on R such that f(x)=0 almost everywhere.




Attempt:



Perhaps we could modify the Cantor Function which is non-decreasing, continuous, and constant on each interval in the complement of the Cantor Set in [0,1].




enter image description here



Of course, we'd need to do the following:




  1. Make the Cantor function strictly increasing (since the Cantor Function is constant on certain intervals, it's certainly not strictly increasing as is).


  2. Extend our modified Cantor Function from [0,1] to all of R.


  3. Verify that f(x)=0 for all irrational x (or for all but a countable subset of R).




Answer



Aside. Your item 3 sets an unattainable goal. If a continuous function f satisfies f=0 for all but countably many points of R, then f is a constant function. See Set of zeroes of the derivative of a pathological function.



Here is a more explicit construction than in the post link in comments. Fix r(0,1/2). Let f0(x)=x. Inductively define fn+1 so that




  1. fn+1(x)=fn(x) when x2nZ

  2. If x2nZ, let fn+1(x+2n1)=rfn(x)+(1r)fn(x+2n).

  3. Now that fn+1 has been defined on 2n1Z, extend it to R by linear interpolation.

  4. Let f=limfn.




Here is a piece of this function with r=1/4:



derivative = 0 a.e.



and for clarity, here is the family f0,f1,... shown together. All the construction does is replace each line segment of previous step with two; sort of like von Koch snowflake, but less pointy. (It's a monotonic version of the blancmange curve).



enter image description here




To check that the properties hold, you can proceed as follows:




  1. Since sup|fn+1fn|2n, it follows that fn is a uniformly convergent sequence. So the limit is continuous.

  2. The values of f at every dyadic grid 2nZ are strictly increasing, by direct inspection. Since f eventually stabilizes at dyadic rationals, it is strictly increasing.

  3. Being increasing, f is differentiable almost everywhere. Let x be a point of differentiability (note that x is not a dyadic rational). Then
    f(x)=limn2n(fn(xn+2n)fn(xn))

    where xn2nZ is such that x(xn,xn+2n). The expression inside the limit in (1) is a product of the form ri(1r)j where i+j=n. More precisely, i and j are the numbers of 1s and 0s in the first n digits of the binary expansion of the fractional part of x. It follows that f(x)=0 unless x has a lot more 0s than 1s in the binary expansion; but the number of such points x has zero measure.




(It may be more enjoyable to prove part 3 using the Law of Large Numbers from probability.)


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...