Problem: Show that there exists a continuous strictly increasing function f on R such that f′(x)=0 almost everywhere.
Attempt:
Perhaps we could modify the Cantor Function which is non-decreasing, continuous, and constant on each interval in the complement of the Cantor Set in [0,1].
Of course, we'd need to do the following:
Make the Cantor function strictly increasing (since the Cantor Function is constant on certain intervals, it's certainly not strictly increasing as is).
Extend our modified Cantor Function from [0,1] to all of R.
Verify that f′(x)=0 for all irrational x (or for all but a countable subset of R).
Answer
Aside. Your item 3 sets an unattainable goal. If a continuous function f satisfies f′=0 for all but countably many points of R, then f is a constant function. See Set of zeroes of the derivative of a pathological function.
Here is a more explicit construction than in the post link in comments. Fix r∈(0,1/2). Let f0(x)=x. Inductively define fn+1 so that
- fn+1(x)=fn(x) when x∈2−nZ
- If x∈2−nZ, let fn+1(x+2−n−1)=rfn(x)+(1−r)fn(x+2−n).
- Now that fn+1 has been defined on 2−n−1Z, extend it to R by linear interpolation.
- Let f=limfn.
Here is a piece of this function with r=1/4:
and for clarity, here is the family f0,f1,... shown together. All the construction does is replace each line segment of previous step with two; sort of like von Koch snowflake, but less pointy. (It's a monotonic version of the blancmange curve).
To check that the properties hold, you can proceed as follows:
- Since sup|fn+1−fn|≤2−n, it follows that fn is a uniformly convergent sequence. So the limit is continuous.
- The values of f at every dyadic grid 2−nZ are strictly increasing, by direct inspection. Since f eventually stabilizes at dyadic rationals, it is strictly increasing.
- Being increasing, f is differentiable almost everywhere. Let x be a point of differentiability (note that x is not a dyadic rational). Then
f′(x)=limn→∞2n(fn(xn+2−n)−fn(xn))
where xn∈2−nZ is such that x∈(xn,xn+2−n). The expression inside the limit in (1) is a product of the form ri(1−r)j where i+j=n. More precisely, i and j are the numbers of 1s and 0s in the first n digits of the binary expansion of the fractional part of x. It follows that f′(x)=0 unless x has a lot more 0s than 1s in the binary expansion; but the number of such points x has zero measure.
(It may be more enjoyable to prove part 3 using the Law of Large Numbers from probability.)
No comments:
Post a Comment