Below is an attempt at a proof of the following problem. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thx!
Let E be a set and On={x:d(x,E)<1n}.
Show
If E is compact then m(E)=limn→∞m(On).
This is false for E closed and unbounded or E open and bounded.
Note that all sets are real and measurable refers to Lebesgue measurable.
Suppose E is compact. Then m(E)<∞. Also, since each On is an open set of Rd, m(On)<∞. If either of the following is true, we have that limn→∞m(On)=m(E):
On↗E
On↘E
Now ⋂∞n=1On={x:d(x,E)=0}.
That is, x∈⋂∞n=1On⟺∃n>1ϵ, n∈N⟺x∈{x∣d(x,E)=0}.
Then we have that ⋂∞n=1On=E and On↘E. Thus m(E)=limn→∞m(On).
Suppose E is closed and unbounded. Let E={(x,y):y=2} and On={(x,y):d(x,E)<1n}.
Since E is a line in R2, m(E)=0.
Also, since the measure of a rectangle in Rd is its volume, m(On)=|On|=∞, since the rectangle On is unbounded.
It is therefore apparent that m(E)≠limn→∞m(On).
Suppose E is open and bounded.
Let E=(0,1) and On={x∣d(x,E)<1n}.
R−E is closed and On∈R−E.
Since R−E contains all its limit points limn→∞On=O∈R−E.
Thus limn→∞m(On)≠m(E).
Answer
Your example for E open and bounded is not correct. I really can't tell what you are doing, but it should be clear that m((0,1))=limn→∞m(On) in this case.
Hint for an example: Let E be an open dense subset of (0,1) such that m(E)<1/2.,
No comments:
Post a Comment