Thursday, 1 August 2019

abstract algebra - Characterising the irreducible polynomials in positive characteristic whose roots generate the (cyclic) group of units of the splitting field

For a nonzero element αFpn (the finite field of cardinality pn) is there a simple criterion to tell whether α is a generator of the cyclic group F×pn by looking at the minimal polynomial of α over Fp?




Here is what I know so far:
Let n1 be an integer, p be a prime and Fp=Z/pZ be the prime field of characteristic p. It is known that there is a unique (upto isomorphism) field Fpn of cardinality pn which is the splitting field of g(x)=xpnx.



If f(x)Fp[x] is monic irreducible of degree n then f(x) is separable and FpnFp[t]/(f(t)) is also the splitting field of f(x).
Further if α is any root of f(x) in Fpn then




  • Fpn=Fp(α) (so α is a primitive element of the field extension Fpn/Fp)

  • mα,Fp(x)=f(x) (the minimal polynomial of α over Fp)

  • f(x)=n1i=0(xαpi)




Also, there are exactly




  • M(n,p)/n distinct degree n monic irreducible polynomials in Fp[x]

  • M(n,p)=dnpn/dμ(d) distinct primitive elements β of Fpn/Fp

  • pn1 elements in the cyclic group F×pn

  • ϕ(pn1) generators of the cyclic group F×pn




It is clear that each generator β of the cyclic group F×pn is an element of degree n over Fp, i.e. degmβ,Fp(x)=n, and hence is a primitive element of the field extension. It is also clear that all the other roots βpi of the minimal polynomial mβ,Fp(x) are also generators of the cyclic group since gcd.



However in general the number of cyclic generators \phi (p^n - 1) is much less than the number of primitive elements of the extension M (n, p) (for example, for n = 2, \phi (p^2 - 1) will be much less than M (2, p) = p^2 - p.



So now the question is:




  1. Characterise all the monic irreducible polynomials f (x) \in \mathbb F_p [x] whose roots are cyclic generators of \mathbb F_{p^n}^\times.

  2. If \beta is a cyclic generator of \mathbb F_{p^n}^\times what are the indices 0 \le k < p^n for which the degree of \beta^k over \mathbb F_p is n (or in general any d \mid n)?




P.S. I don't know any Galois theory, so if you use any of that, then I would appreciate if a reference is given.

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...