It is well known that Leibniz derived the series
π4=∞∑i=0(−1)i2i+1,
but apparently he did not prove that
π26=∞∑i=11i2.
Euler did, in 1741 (unfortunately, after the demise of Leibniz). Note that this was also before the time of Fourier.
My question: do we now have the tools to prove (2) using solely (1) as the definition of π? Any positive/negative results would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Clarification: I am not looking for a full-fledged rigorous proof of (1)⇒(2). An estimate that (2) should hold, given (1), would qualify as an answer.
Answer
Note that proving ∞∑k=11k2=π26(♠)
is equivalent to proving ∞∑k=01(2k+1)2=π28(♣)
The hope for proving (♣) instead of (♠) is that squaring π4 gives π216 and adding this twice gives us π28. We will in fact prove that ∞∑k=−∞1(2k+1)2=(∞∑k=−∞(−1)k(2k+1))2
Since we know ∞∑k=0(−1)k(2k+1)=π4
and N∑k=0(−1)k(2k+1)=−1∑k=−(N+1)(−1)k(2k+1),
we have that ∞∑k=−∞(−1)k(2k+1)=π2
Square the above to get
(k=N∑k=−N−1(−1)k(2k+1))2=(k=N∑k=−N−1(−1)k(2k+1))(j=N∑j=−N−1(−1)j(2j+1))=k=N∑k=−N−1j=N∑j=−N−1(−1)j+k(2k+1)(2j+1)=k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)(1(2k+1)−1(2j+1))+k=N∑k=−N−1(−1)2k(2k+1)(2k+1)
Hence,
(k=N∑k=−N−1(−1)k(2k+1))2−k=N∑k=−N−11(2k+1)(2k+1)=k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)(1(2k+1)−1(2j+1))
Let us now show that
(♡)⏞k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)(1(2k+1)−1(2j+1))→0 as N→∞
We have
(♡)=k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)1(2k+1)−k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)1(2j+1)=k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)1(2k+1)+k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(k−j)1(2j+1)=2×(k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k2(j−k)1(2k+1))=k=N∑j,k=−N−1j≠k(−1)j+k(j−k)1(2k+1)=N∑k=−N−1(−1)k(2k+1)(N∑j=−N−1j≠k(−1)j(j−k))⏟(♢k)
Let us simplify (♢k) a bit. Assuming k≠−N−1, we have
N∑j=−N−1j≠k(−1)j(j−k)=N∑j=k+1(−1)j(j−k)+k−1∑j=−N−1(−1)j(j−k)=((−1)k+11+(−1)k+22+⋯+(−1)NN−k)+((−1)k−1(−1)+(−1)k−2(−2)+⋯+(−1)−N−1−N−1−k)=(−1)k+1N+|k|+1∑j=N−|k|+1(−1)jj
If k=−N−1, we have
N∑j=−N−1j≠k(−1)j(j−k)=N∑j=−N(−1)j(j+N+1)=(−1)N−12N+1∑j=1(−1)jj
We now have
(♡)=N∑k=0(−1)k♢k+(−1)−k−1♢−k−12k+1=N∑k=0(−1)k(♢k−♢−k−1)2k+1
Now for k≥0
(♢k−♢−k−1)=(−1)k+1N+k+1∑j=N−k+1(−1)jj−(−1)−kN+(k+1)+1∑j=N−(k+1)+1(−1)jj=2⋅(−1)k+1⋅N+k+1∑j=N−k+1(−1)jj+(−1)N+1(1N+k+2+1N−k)
Hence,
|♢k−♢−k−1|=O(1N)
|(♡)|≤N∑k=012k+1O(1/N)=O(log(2N+1)/N)→0
Hence,
(k=N∑k=−N−1(−1)k(2k+1))2−k=N∑k=−N−11(2k+1)(2k+1)→0
Hence,
(∞∑k=−∞(−1)k(2k+1))2=∞∑k=−∞1(2k+1)(2k+1)=2∞∑k=01(2k+1)2=2⋅34⋅ζ(2)
Hence,ζ(2)=23⋅π24=π26
No comments:
Post a Comment