Tuesday, 10 March 2015

Why is this rational expressions indeterminate when evaluated?



I have this rational expression to evaluate,
$$
{{3a-3}\over {4a(a-1)}} \text { if } a=1.
$$



I understand that if you substitute 1, both the numerator and denominator would turn out 0, thus making it indeterminate. But what if I factor out the numerator $3a-3$ to $3(a-1)$ and cancel out $(a-1)$ from both the numerator and denominator, wouldn't it just give $3\over4$ as the answer?



Answer



For this function:



$$\frac{3a-3}{4a(a-1)}$$



When $a=1$ this function will not be defined at that specific x-value.



The reason is because:



$$\frac{3a-3}{4a(a-1)} = \frac{3}{4a}$$




Even though the $(a-1)$ term cancels, the function still isn't defined at that point. We call $a = 1$ to be a hole in the function.



You can read more about it here



Comment if you have any questions.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$

How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...