Give a constructive proof to show that for all n≥1 ,
n∑i=1i3=(n∑i=1i)2
Observe that (n+1)4−n4=4n3+6n2+4n+1 .
Now, the two following equalities are obvious:
n∑i=1i3=13+23+33+...+n3
(n∑i=1i)2=(1+2+3+...+n)2
And they are both obviously equivalent given the first few test cases:
n∑i=1i3=A(n)
- A(1)=13=1
- A(2)=13+23=1+8=9
- A(3)=13+23+33=9+27=36
(n∑i=1i)2=B(n)
- B(1)=(1)2=1
- B(2)=(1+2)2=9
- B(3)=(1+2+3)2=36
Now, I am thinking of finding the closed-forms for both functions in the hopes that they are indeed the same. Then I would prove those closed forms to work by induction. But:
- I don't know if that would be a sound way to do it.
- I don't know if this would even qualify as constructive, as the question requests.
As you may tell, I am no math major. I am a Computer Science major, though. This is a computing fundamentals class. I took discrete 1.5 years ago, so my knowledge is about as fresh as a litter box. I've been in quite a rut for a few hours over this.
Answer
Your goal is to prove the statement S(n) for all n≥1 where
S(n):13+23+33+⋯+n3=[n(n+1)2]2.
Using Σ-notation, we may rewrite S(n) as follows:
S(n):n∑r=1r3=[n(n+1)2]2.
Base step: The statement S(1) says that (1)3=(1)2 which is true because 1=1.
Inductive step [S(k)→S(k+1)]: Fix some k≥1, where k∈N. Assume that
S(k):k∑r=1r3=[k(k+1)2]2
holds. To be proved is that
S(k+1):k+1∑r=1r3=[(k+1)((k+1)+1)2]2
follows. Beginning with the left side of S(k+1),
k+1∑r=1r3=k∑r=1r3+(k+1)3=[k(k+1)2]2+(k+1)3=(k+1)24[k2+4(k+1)]=(k+1)24[(k+2)(k+2)]=(k+1)2(k+2)24=[(k+1)(k+2)2]2=[(k+1)((k+1)+1)2]2,
one arrives at the right side of S(k+1), thereby showing that S(k+1) is also true, completing the inductive step.
By mathematical induction, it is proved that for all n≥1, where n∈N, that the statement S(n) is true.
Note: The step where (k+1)24 is factored out is an important one. If we do not factor this out and, instead, choose to expand (k+1)3, the problem becomes much more messy than it needs to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment