Sunday, 1 March 2015

calculus - General rule for the nth order derivative of a function to exist

I've just got this general rule for the nth order derivative of a function to exist:



A function f(x) is differentiable n times only if:
limh0+nr=0(1)r(nr)f(x(nr)h)(h)n=limh0+nr=0(1)r(nr)f(x+(nr)h)hn


Please not that h itself is assumed to be positive in both the limits. That's why I've written that h0+ in both. I call the LHS the Left-hand nth derivative and the RHS, the right hand nth order derivative.



Have I got this result correct or Can counter-examples be given against it (examples in which the nth order derivative of a function does not exist but still these two limits are equal or examples in which the nth derivative of a function exists but these two limits are unequal)?



EDIT: Here, x can be replaced by c to check the differentiability at a particular point x=c.




UPDATE: After the answer by mjqxxxx, I guess that the requirement is that the first n1 derivatives should exist, only then the formula can be used.

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...