Sunday, 21 February 2016

algebra precalculus - Absolute value fraction problem



Is there an easier way to (I am aware of my poor translation, but am not familiar with english terminology; however, I think you will understand.) "Reduce the following fraction:"



x|x1|x+1x22|x|+1



besides doing numerous situations with absolute values (in this case, 4 situations);
in this case I'd make:
i.) x10,  x0




ii.) x10,  x0



iii.) x10,  x0



iv.) x10,  x0



Then solve each pair's cross-section of the two solutions...



Second thing I'm not certain about are the "" and "" signs. Do I have to put on both equations in the pair the equal sign "=", or just ">" / "<". If it's not clear, do I have to make every like:




i.) x10,  x0



ii.) x10,  x0



or



i.) x10,  x<0



ii.) x10,  x>0




Please explain when to put the "" and "".



EDIT:
Basically, what I wanted to know is, if there is any kind of faster - automated - way of solving the question. The answers you provided matched my opinion and praxis. The thing here is, I know a faster way of solving these, it includes a, so called "table" (with 'null-points', something like RecklessReckoner advised), if someone is interested I'll make a photo of it. It makes solving these totally automated that you don't have to think about the actual problem and/or understand it, that's why I tried to solve these traditionally to understand it - behind the scenes. Once again, thanks for your answers.


Answer



It takes thinking. When you split into cases, generally you have something like |xa|, which will be xa if xa and ax if ax. If x=a it doesn't matter which direction you use, so generally you use the sign with the one with the equals because you don't want to exclude a potential solution. The point is "do you know it isn't equal-otherwise include the equals. Then you need to check the solutions you find in the original equation because you may have introduced extraneous solutions.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...