I'm having a pretty hard time with this. I'm asked to show that, in the category of sets with exactly 17 elements, no two objects have either a direct product nor direct sum. Part of me doesn't even believe this statement—but whenever I try to come up with a direct product, I get snagged.
Let (C,α,β) be a [potential] direct product of A and B. Fix some object, C′, with mappings, α′ and β′, from C′ to A and B respectively. We need a unique γ:C′→C such that α∘γ=α′ and β∘γ=β′.
C=A×B just can't work, because A×B necessarily has more than 17 elements (in fact, no Cartesian-product-like C can work, because the number of elements is fixed). What about some 17-element subset of A×B? (In the category of sets, α and β are injective, but not necessarily surjective). But, what if α′ and β′ are both surjective? So, that can't work, because there's no γ that could satisfy this (doesn't that mean that, in the general category of sets, α and β have to also be surjective? If they don't "touch" every element in both A and B, then one can just define a α′ or β′ that touches the elements α or β don't—thus making impossible a direct product.)
Let α(cn)=an and β(cn)=bn. This contains bijective α and β, but all we have to do is define a C′ such that α′(c1)=a1 and β′(c1)=b2.
Ok. So, α and β have to be bijective. Let's try to prove this via negation: Since these mappings are necessarily bijective, they have to have an inverse. Thus, γ must be such that γ=α−1∘α′ and γ=β−1∘β′. To show that we can choose an object C′ where γ can't make the graph commute, just choose α′ and β′ such that α−1∘α≠β−1∘β.
- Can I assume that such an α′ and β′ will always exist?
- Was there no point to the number of elements being 17 specifically? This all seems to work for any category of sets with a fixed number of elements.
- Is there something crucial I'm missing?
Answer
Let n≥2. If A,B have a product P in the category of sets with n elements, then hom(A,P)≅hom(A,A)×hom(A,B) shows nn=nn⋅nn, a contradiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment