Saturday, 4 October 2014

geometry - Why, conceptually, do limaçons r=a+bcostheta have dimples when $|frac{a}{b}|

Using calculus, I can justify that limaçons—the polar graphs of r=a+bcosθ for various nonzero real values of a and b—are dimpled when |ab|<2, but that doesn't seem to yield any conceptual reason why that should be the case. The boundary value 2 seems too nice to not have a conceptual explanation, so is there one?







The calculus: For this sort of limaçon, with cosine, there are always vertical tangents to the graph at θ=kπ, and the dimple is characterized by a pair of vertical tangents near one of those two locations, but equally spaced before and after it, whereas a non-dimpled limaçon only has those two vertical tangents. Vertical tangents occur when dydx is undefined; for polars, that means when dydθ is undefined (for our limaçon, never) or when dxdθ=0. For our limaçon, dxdθ=sinθ(a+2bcosθ), so dxdθ=0 implies sinθ=0 (θ=kπ) or a+2bcosθ=0. This latter case, which can be rewritten as cosθ=a2b, has no solutions when |a2b|>1, a single solution that is already in the solutions from sinθ=0 when |a2b|=1 (so, no additional vertical tangents and hence no dimple when |ab|2), and two solutions when |a2b|<1 (so two additional vertical tangents and hence a dimple when |ab|<2).

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...