$dx=\frac {dx}{dt}dt $. I know that this deduction is obvious from the chain rule, given that we treat our dx and dt as just numbers. But I find it quite unsatisfactory to think of it in that sense. Is there a better / more "calculus-inclined" way of thinking about this equality. Can you please explain both the LHS and RHS individually.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$
How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...
-
Self-studying some properties of the exponential-function I came to the question of ways to assign a value to the divergent sum $$s=\sum_{k=...
-
Ok, according to some notes I have, the following is true for a random variable $X$ that can only take on positive values, i.e $P(X<0=0)$...
-
Make a bijection that shows $|\mathbb C| = |\mathbb R| $ First I thought of dividing the complex numbers in the real parts and the c...
No comments:
Post a Comment