Saturday, 2 September 2017

combinatorics - Combinatorial Proof for the Identity sumnk=0binomnkleft(2right)k=(1)n



I know how to prove this identity algebraically, but that's the stupidly boring way of doing problems. I can't think of a combinatorial proof for this, as in using counting committees or something like that. It's hard to deal with the negative 2 ...



nk=0(nk)(2)k=(1)n



Any help is appreciated, thanks!



Answer



The most natural combinatorial proof starts by multiplying the desired identity by (1)n to make it



nk=0(nk)2k(1)nk=1.



Of course this is immediate from the binomial theorem, but if you want something more explicitly combinatorial, you can then replace k by nk to get



nk=0(nk)(1)k2nk=1.



Suppose that we want to count the subsets of [n]={1,,n} that do not contain any element of [n]. Of course the only such subset is , so the value should be 1. On the other hand, if for k[n] we let Ak be the family of subsets of [n] containing k, then for any non-empty F[n] we have




|kFAk|=2nk,



and there are (nk) such F[n], so the result follows from the inclusion-exclusion principle.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...