Monday, 18 September 2017

exponential function - The integral inti0nftyet2dt




Me and my highschool teacher have argued about the limit for quite a long time.



We have easily reached the conclusion that integral from 0 to x of et2dt has a limit somewhere between 0 and π/2, as we used a little trick, precisely the inequality et>t+1 for every real x. Replacing t with t2, inversing, and integrating from 0 to x, gives a beautiful tan1 and π/2 comes naturally.




Next, the limit seemed impossible to find. One week later, after some google searches, i have found what the limit is. This usually spoils the thrill of a problem, but in this case it only added to the curiosity. My teacher then explained that modern approaches, like a computerised approximation, might have been applied to find the limit, since the erf is not elementary. I have argued that the result was to beautiful to be only the result of computer brute force.



After a really vague introduction to fourier series that he provided, i understood that fourier kind of generalised the first inequality, the one i have used to get the bounds for the integral, with more terms of higher powers.



To be on point: I wish to find a simple proof of the result that the limit is indeed π/2, using the same concepts I am familiar with. I do not know what really Fourier does, but i am open to any new information.



Thank you for your time, i appreciate it a lot. I am also sorry for not using proper mathematical symbols, since I am using the app.


Answer



It's useless outside of this one specific integral (and its obvious variants), but here's a trick due to Poisson:

(dxex2)2=dxdyex2ey2=dxdye(x2+y2)=2π00rdrdθer2=πer2|r=0=π,
switching to polar coordinates halfway through. Thus the given integral is 12π.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...