Saturday, 23 December 2017

real analysis - How to prove that exp(x1+x2)=exp(x1)exp(x2)?



In my analysis class, we covered the properties of the exponential function (as of now we use exp instead of e). One of the properties of e is that exp(x1+x2)=exp(x1)exp(x2). In high school this was just assumed knowledge but now we have to prove that this statement is indeed true, which is proving to be quite difficult.



I assume that one would need to work out the derivatives of both side and see if they are equal. Then if f(0)=1 we can assume that both sides of the equation are true.


Answer



From your comments it appears that you are using the definition of exp(x) as the unique solution to f(x)=f(x),f(0)=1. It can be proved that such a solution must be non-zero for all x (see second part of this answer). Thus exp(x)0 for all x. Let a be any arbitrary real number and consider the function g defined by g(x)=exp(x+a)/exp(x). We have g(x)=exp(x)exp(x+a)exp(x+a)exp(x)(exp(x))2=0

and thus g is a constant. It follows that g(x)=g(0)=exp(a) and thus exp(x+a)=exp(x)exp(a)
Now replace x by x1 and a by x2.







The above technique does not work if one chooses g(x)=exp(x+a)exp(x)exp(a)

because one can't see that g(x)=0 in very obvious manner. But this can be done with some effort. Using above definition of g one gets g(x)=g(x),g(0)=0. Ideally when one studies the definition of exponential function as a solution of differential equation f(x)=f(x),f(0)=1 then the first step is to show that if the solution exists then it must be unique. And that uniqueness is shown by the following:




Theorem: If function g:RR satisfies g(x)=g(x),g(0)=0 then g(x)=0 for all values of x.




On the contrary assume that there is some a such that g(a)0 and consider h(x)=g(a+x)g(ax)

then h(x)=g(a+x)g(ax)g(a+x)g(ax)=0
so that h is constant and h(x)=h(0)=g(a)g(a)>0 or in other words g(a+x)g(ax)>0. Putting x=a and noting that g(0)=0 we see that 0>0 and this contradiction shows that g(x)=0 for all x and we are done. The same proof can be used to show that exp(x)0. We just need to consider h(x)=exp(x)exp(x).


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...