Sunday, 17 December 2017

real analysis - Sub-gradient and super-gradient are bounded implies globally Lipschitz.



Let u be a real valued function defined on the open set ΩRn. Assume that u is continuous, for any xΩ, the sets
Du(x)={pRn:lim infyxu(y)u(x)p,yxyx0}D+u(x)={pRn:lim supyxu(y)u(x)p,yxyx0}


are called, respectively the subdifferential and superdifferential of u at x.




One can prove that for a C1 function ϕ then



uϕhas a strict max atx0uis touched from above byϕatx0Dϕ(x0)D+u(x0),uϕhas a strict min atx0uis touched from below byϕatx0Dϕ(x0)Du(x0).


And u is differentiable at x if and only if D+u(x)=Du(x)={u(x)}.




MY QUESTION: If I have u is continuous on the whole space Rn and there exists a constant C>0 such that



pCfor allpD+u(x)orpDu(x)for allx.


Could I have u is Lipschitz globally? This question pops out when I study the notion of viscosity solution for Hamilton-Jacobi equations. We know that if u is differentiable and Du is bounded then u is Lipschitz, I just wonder that maybe my statement is true, but I failed to prove it, though I can prove that it is locally Lipschitz.


Answer



Yes. The proof is similar to how one proves that viscosity solutions are Lipschitz when the Hamiltonian is coercive. You will have to assume some growth conditions on u at (though this could be relaxed with some effort). I'll give the proof for u bounded.



Assume u is bounded and let yRn. Define ϕ(x)=(C+ϵ)|xy|. Since u is bounded, uϕ attains its maximum at some point x0Rn. If x0y then ϕ is smooth in a neighborhood of x0 and so p:=Dϕ(x0)D+u(x0). Computing |p|=C+ϵ>C, we get a contradiction.




Therefore x0=y and we get



u(x)(C+ϵ)|xy|u(y)



for all ϵ>0 and xRn. It follows that



u(x)u(y)C|xy|



for all x,yRn. The basic idea of the proof is that we showed we can touch the graph of u with a cone ϕ(x).



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...