Monday, 4 December 2017

real analysis - Proving analytical statement, Intermediate Value Theorem




Let's define f as a continuous function with f:[0;2]R and f(0)=f(2).



Now, I want to show that:



x0[0;1]:f(x0)=f(x0+1)
I tried to plot a few functions in order to construct a counterexample, but it seems that this statement really is true.



Unfortunately, I don't think I'm entirely sure why this works, yet. My current guess is that it has something to do with the Intermediate Value Theorem, as f is continuous. In other words: If our function value 'goes up', it'll have to 'come back down' eventually (and vice versa), since it still needs to fulfill f(0)=f(2).



Can someone help me prove this statement?



Answer



Consider the following function on [0,1],



g(x)=f(x+1)f(x)



where we assume f(0)=f(2). We'd like to show there is some x0[0,1] such that g(x0)=0. So if we can show g(x)>0 on some interval and g(x)<0 somewhere as well, since g(x) is continuous it must pass 0. This is the context of the intermediate value theorem. So let's consider x=0 and 1, we see that



g(0)=f(1)f(0)&g(1)=f(2)f(1)=f(0)f(1)=g(0)



Thus we see that g(x) does indeed change sign. So by the intermediate value theorem we know that it must be zero somewhere.



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...