Motivation. Let μ(n) the Möbius function and we denote with rad(n)=∏p∣np
Fact. Using that μ(n)=0 iff $\operatorname{rad}(n)
Since series involving rad(n) are interestings, I've thought this exercise:
Question. We know Chebyshev's result about the asymptotic behaviour of ∑p≤nlogpp and since the series ∞∑n=1lograd(n)n
has positive terms, I know that it diverges. But, is it possible to deduce some more precisely about the asymptotic behaviour of the partial sums N∑n=1lograd(n)nas N→∞? Provide hints, or a detailed answer, as you prefer. Or references if it is well known. Many thanks.
Answer
In the following, p always runs over primes, and n,k over positive integers. By changing the order of summation, we obtain
∑n⩽xlog(radn)n=∑n⩽x∑p∣nlogpn=∑p⩽x∑n⩽xp∣nlogpn=∑p⩽xlogpp∑k⩽x/p1k=∑p⩽xlogpp(logxp+γ+O(px))=logx∑p⩽xlogpp−∑p⩽x(logp)2p+γ∑p⩽xlogpp+O(1x∑p⩽xlogp).
From the prime number theorem, we have the strengthening of Mertens' first theorem that there is a constant C such that
∑p⩽xlogpp=logx+C+o(1).
Also, ϑ(x)=∑p⩽xlogp∼x, so it remains to find the behaviour of
∑p⩽x(logp)2p=(logx+C+o(1))logx−∫x2logt+C+o(1)tdt=(logx)2+Clogx+o(logx)−12((logx)2−(log2)2)−Clogx+Clog2−o(logx)=12(logx)2+o(logx)
to overall get
∑n⩽xlog(radn)n=12(logx)2+(C+γ)logx+o(logx).
No comments:
Post a Comment