Wednesday, 21 March 2018

integration - Evaluating the contour integral intinfty0fracsin3(x)x3mathrmdx





I am trying to show



0sin3(x)x3dx=3π8.



I believe the contour I should use is a semicircle in the upper half plane with a slight bump at the origin, so I miss the singularity.



Lastly I have the hint to consider
0e3iz3eiz+2z3dz



around the contour I mentioned. Thanks for any help or hints!



Answer



Your coutour will work perfectly, so I wonder why you're hesitating to proceed with your calculation. Anyway, here is a solution:



Since sin3z=(sin3z3sinz)/4, we have



0sin3xx3dx=18lim



where the term -2 is introduced in order to cancel out the pole of order 3, without affecting the value of the integral. Consider the counterclockwise-oriented upper semicircle C of radius R, centered at the origin, with semicircular indent of radius \epsilon. Let \Gamma_{R}^{+} and \gamma_{\epsilon}^{-} denote semicircular arcs of C of radius R and \epsilon, respectively. If we put



f(z) = \frac{3 e^{iz} - e^{3iz} - 2}{z^3},




then we find that




  • On \Gamma_R^+, we have |f(z)| \leq 6R^{-3} and thus
    \int_{\Gamma_{R}^{+}} f(z) \, dz \to 0 \quad \text{as } R \to \infty.


  • Notice that
    f(z) = \frac{3}{z} + O(1) \quad \text{near } z = 0.
    So by the direct computation,
    \int_{\gamma_{\epsilon}^{-}} f(z) \, dz = -\int_{0}^{\pi} f(\epsilon e^{i\theta}) i\epsilon e^{i\theta} \, d\theta = -\int_{0}^{\pi} (3i + O(\epsilon)) \, d\theta \to -3\pi i \quad \text{as } \epsilon \to 0.
    (This is exactly the same as -\pi i times the residue of f at z = 0. The emergence of residue can be attributed to the fact that f has only simple pole at z = 0.)




Since f(z) has no pole on the region enclosed by C, we have
\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{\mathbb{R} \backslash (-\epsilon, \epsilon)} \frac{3 e^{iz} - e^{3iz} - 2}{z^3} \, dz = 3\pi i.
This proves the desired identity.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...