Proof: Consider the quadratic equation x2+x+1=0. Then, we can see that x2=−x−1. Assuming that x is not zero (which it clearly isn't, from the equation) we can divide by x to give
x=−1−1x
Substitute this back into the x term in the middle of the original equation, so
x2+(−1−1x)+1=0
This reduces to
x2=1x
So, x3=1, so x=1 is the solution. Substituting back into the equation for x gives
12+1+1=0Therefore, 3=0.
What happened?
Answer
Up to x3=1 everything is fine. This allows you to conclude that x∈{z∈C:z3=1}. Since {z∈C:z3=1}={−1+i√32,−1−i√32,1}, then x is one of the elements of this set.
You made a reasoning consisting of logical consequences, not one of logical equivalences. That's why you can tell that x∈{z∈C:z3=1}, but you can't say which one is it.
See this for a similar issue.
An even more simpler version of your mistake is this: suppose x2=1, then x=1.
You can convince yourself that this is wrong and that you did the same thing in your question.
No comments:
Post a Comment