Write 100 as the sum of two positive integers, one of them being a multiple of 7, while the other is a multiple of 11.
Since 100 is not a big number, I followed the straightforward reasoning of writing all multiples up to 100 of either 11 or 7, and then finding the complement that is also a multiple of the other. So then
100=44+56=4×11+8×7.
But is it the smart way of doing it? Is it the way I was supposed to solve it? I'm thinking here about a situation with a really large number that turns my plug-in method sort of unwise.
Answer
From Bezout's Lemma, note that since gcd, which divides 100, there exists x,y \in \mathbb{Z} such that 7x+11y=100.
A candidate solution is (x,y) = (8,4).
The rest of the solution is given by (x,y) = (8+11m,4-7m), where m \in \mathbb{Z}. Since we are looking for positive integers as solutions, we need 8+11m > 0 and 4-7m>0, which gives us $-\frac8{11}
If you do not like to guess your candidate solution, a more algorithmic procedure is using Euclid' algorithm to obtain solution to 7a+11b=1, which is as follows.
We have
\begin{align} 11 & = 7 \cdot (1) + 4 \implies 4 = 11 - 7 \cdot (1)\\ 7 & = 4 \cdot (1) + 3 \implies 3 = 7 - 4 \cdot (1) \implies 3 = 7 - (11-7\cdot (1))\cdot (1) = 2\cdot 7 - 11\\ 4 & = 3 \cdot (1) + 1 \implies 1 = 4 - 3 \cdot (1) \implies 1 = (11-7 \cdot(1)) - (2\cdot 7 - 11) \cdot 1 = 11 \cdot 2-7 \cdot 3 \end{align}
This means the solution to 7a+11b=1 using Euclid' algorithm is (-3,2). Hence, the candidate solution 7x+11y=100 is (-300,200). Now all possible solutions are given by (x,y) = (-300+11n,200-7n). Since we need x and y to be positive, we need -300+11n > 0 and 200-7n > 0, which gives us
\dfrac{300}{11} < n < \dfrac{200}7 \implies 27 \dfrac3{11} < n < 28 \dfrac47
The only integer in this range is n=28, which again gives (x,y) = (8,4).
No comments:
Post a Comment