Monday, 10 December 2018

abstract algebra - Extension of residue fields and algebraic independence




Let A be a Noetherian integral domain, B a ring extension of A that is an integral domain, PSpecB,p=PA. Denote by κ(p), κ(P) the residue fields of the two prime ideals. Then we see that there is a field extension κ(p)κ(P). Let t be a non-negative integer such that ttr.degκ(p)κ(P).



Matsumura in his Commutative Ring Theory, proof of Theorem 15.5, says "let c1,,ctB such that their images modulo P are algebraically independent over A/p."



Question: Why would such elements exist?



(Edited)



Remark: Matsumura wants to prove that ht(P)+tr.degκ(p)κ(P)ht(p)+tr.degAB and he starts by proving that we can assume that B is a finitely generated A-algebra. Specifically, he is showing that we can construct a subring C of B that is a finitely-generated A-algebra, and that if the theorem is true for C, then it is true of B. My question relates to his argument of "why we can assume that". Consequently, in answering my question, we can not make the assumption that B is a finitely generated A-algebra.



Answer



Take x1,,xt to be algebraically independent over k(p) in k(P). Then, write each xi as a fraction. Then, you get 2t elements of B/P. I claim that there are t algebraically independent among the 2t elements. Why? What happens if there is only $m

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...