Thursday, 6 December 2018

number theory - Proof that the nth root of a rational s/t is irrational unless s and t are perfect nth powers



I'm trying to prove that nst is irrational unless both s and t are perfect nth powers. I have found plenty of proofs for nth root of an integer but cannot find anything for rationals. Also trying to work up from the proofs I have found is rather difficult.



My lecturer wants me to prove this using uniqueness of prime factorisation but I also have no idea where to start with that.




Any help is greatly appreciated.


Answer



To build off Vasya and Calum's helpful comments:



Let st be an irreducible fraction (to address Vasya's comment).



Continuing with the main proof, recall Vasya's comment:




nst=nsnt





We will quickly prove this.



Obviously (nst)n=st.



Notice st=(ns)n(nt)n=(nsnt)n.



It follows that nst=nsnt since the nth root is either a bijection or always positive.




Without loss of generality, let s have a prime factorization pa11pa22...paii. Let ns be an integer with prime factorization qb11qb22...qbjj.



Clearly pa11pa22...paii=qnb11qnb22...qnbjj.
We know the prime factorization of s is unique, so we know that each power of p corresponds to some power of q.
It's not clear which p corresponds to which q, but it is clear that all the prime factors are nth powers.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...