Tuesday, 19 February 2013

elementary set theory - How to prove AcapBsubseteqoverlineAtriangleB




An exercise asks me to prove the following:
AB¯AB



Unlike most other exercises, this one implies a symmetric difference, of which I am unfamiliar in this kind of proofs. There was little I could do, here:



The statement can be rewritten as the following:
AB¯(AB)(BA)
AB¯(AB)¯(BA)
AB(¯A¯B)(¯B¯A)

I rewrote it because the symmetric difference doesn't seem "primitive" enough for me to operate with. Then my proof begins:
xABxAxB
x(AB)x(BA)
(xAxB)(xBxA)
And then, I got stuck. I don't see how can (xAxB)(xBxA) become what I needed at all.


Answer



You’ve some serious errors in your first calculations: it is not true in general that ¯(AB)(BA)=¯AB¯BA or that ¯AB¯BA=(¯A¯B)(¯B¯A). In fact,



¯(AB)(BA)=¯AB¯BA




by one of the de Morgan laws, and ¯AB=¯AB, also by de Morgan.



Here’s an approach that does work.



Suppose that xAB; you want to show that x is not in AB. Judging by the work in your question, your definition of AB is (AB)(BA), so you want to show that



x(AB)(BA).



To do this, you must show that xAB and xBA. But that’s easy: if x were in AB, then by definition we’d have xA, which is fine, and xB, which is not fine: since xAB, we know that x is in B. Thus, x cannot belong to AB: xAB. A virtually identical argument shows that xBA, and hence that x(AB)(BA).




Another approach is to show that your definition of AB is equivalent to another comment definition: AB=(AB)(AB). That makes it very obvious that nothing can belong both to AB and AB.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...