Friday, 22 February 2013

sequences and series - What is the partial sum of :sum+inftyn=1zeta(n)en2 and what about it's closed form?



I selected this sum +n=1ζ(n)en2 for evaluation, my weaker assumptions showed me that is convergent for this reason the term en2 vanish when n+ yield to the result +.0 which almost is 0 because ζ(n) for large n is diverge, Wolfram alpha say that is a convergent series then what is it's partial sum and it's closed form?


Answer



The given series diverges because of the first term, as ζ(1) represents harmonic series and harmonic series diverges.




I will consider a convergent series instead:



S=n=1ζ(n+1)en2



No closed form is expected to exist, but there's an interesting way to rewrite the series.



First, we rewrite it as a double sum:



S=n=1k=11kn+1en2




Now we consider the term with k=1 separately, because otherwise it would cause us problems lately. In any case it has a closed form in terms of Jacobi theta functions:




n=1en2=12(ϑ3(0,1e)1)




Now let's move on to the rest of the series:



S2=k=2n=11kn+1en2




There's no closed form for the series in the form n=1en2xn (as far as I know or Mathematica knows), but we can rewrite it.



The following might be missing some rigour, but it works. Let's represent the exponential part as an integral:




en2=12πex2/4+inxdx




The imaginary part of the integral is zero, because it is the integral of an odd function over a symmetric inverval. But it is beneficial to write it in exponential form anyway.




Getting back to the series:



S2=12πk=21kex2/4n=11kneinxdx



Because |einx|1 and k2 we can write the closed form for the geometric series under the integral:



S2=12πk=21kex2/4eixkeixdx



We can get rid of the imaginary part, which is again an odd function (as it should be):




eixkeix=kcosx1+iksinxk22kcosx+1



Now we can rewrite the series as a series of real valued integrals:




S2=12πk=21kex2/4kcosx1k22kcosx+1dx




The series under the integral has a closed form too, in terms of digamma functions:





k=21kkcosx1k22kcosx+1=1γ12(ψ(2cosx+isinx)+ψ(2cosxisinx))




Where γ is Euler-Mascheroni constant and the value is real, because the arguments are conjugate.



So we can write:



S2=1γ14πex2/4(ψ(2cosx+isinx)+ψ(2cosxisinx))dx




Naming the integral (which I believe has no closed form) and getting its numerical value from Mathematica, we have:




I=ex2/4(ψ(2cosx+isinx)+ψ(2cosxisinx))dx==1.2890375247789216487




Getting back to the full series we obtain:




S=12(ϑ3(0,1e)+1)γI4π=0.62728755144118062





This is the same as numerical value Mathematica obtains for the original series.






We can also use the integral form of the digamma function to rewrite I as a double integral and get a curious formula:




S=12(ϑ3(0,1e)+1)12π101t1cos(x)cos(log(t)sin(x))1t ex2/4 dt dx




No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...