Saturday, 25 May 2013

algebra precalculus - Please help to complete proof of inclusion and exclusion principle




I want to complete the following proof:



enter image description here



So continuing where the author left off, I did the following:




n1i=1P(Ai)1i<jn1P(AiAj)++(1)nP(A1A2An1)+P(An)P(n1i=1(AiAn))=n1i=1P(Ai)1i<jn1P(AiAj)++(1)nP(A1A2An1)+P(An)[n1i=1P(AiAn)n11i<jn1P(AiAjAn)++(1)nP(AiA2An1An)]




I got here by applying the inclusion exclusion formula to P(n1i=1(AiAn) as the author instructed and then simplyfying based on the following:




(AiAn)(AjAn)=AiAjAn




I tried this new formula with n=3 and I did get the correct answer, so I think that the manipulations I did is correct.




Also, I know I can get the ni=1P(Ai) in the theorem because:




ni=1P(Ai)=n1i=1P(Ai)+P(An)




So, this formula can be simplified to:





ni=1P(Ai)1i<jn1P(AiAj)++(1)nP(A1A2An1)[n1i=1P(AiAn)n11i<jn1P(AiAjAn)++(1)nP(AiA2An1An)]




Now I don't know how to proceed.



If the answer involves manipulating the summations then the more detailed the answer, the better as I am not too familiar with manipulating sums.


Answer



In the first line of your last equation, you have the term 1i<jn1P(AiAj). In the inclusion-exclusion formula, you have to subtract all P(AiAj) for $1\leq i

The next term that should appear on your first line (and that you abbreviated with the dots), is 1i<j<kn1P(AiAjAk). As before, in the inclusion-exclusion principle, you'd have to have 1i<j<knP(AiAjAk), do you see the difference? Again, you are missing the terms of the form P(AiAjAn) for 1i<j<n, and again, those appear in the second line, hence you can regroup to obtain the term of the inclusion-exclusion formula.




I hope you now get the pattern. Each time with the induction hypothesis on the first line you obtained a formula for which some terms are missing, but the missing terms come from the second line (and the very last term missing comes from the third line), hence you regroup and you are done. This proof can be made more "formal" by writing it with summations, but I think its clearer this way.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...