I need to find the radius of convergence and the behavior at the endpoints of
∞∑n=0xn(cos−1(√n+1−√n))n.
I would like that you check if my results are correct, and if not, where I made a mistake. Thank you.
Using the root test, I get
limn→∞|xn(cos−1(√n+1−√n))n|1n if and only if |x|<π2,
by using the fact that limn→∞√n+1−√n=0 and |cos−1(0)|=π2
Now, on the endpoints, we have x=π2 and x=−π2 which, using the root test again, seems to result in 1 and −1. So we sum up infinitely many 1 resp. −1, so it diverges on both endpoints.
Are my results correct? Thanks for your help!
Answer
Edit: in order to answer as comprehensively as possible to the question, following the OP's comments, I have reworked and extended my former answer.
The first one of your conclusions is right, while you are misinterpreting the second one: when x=±π2 you are on the boundary of the circle of convergence, therefore the power series may or may not converge at that points: the root test does to work when
limn→∞n√anxn=limn→∞|12nπn(cos−1(√n+1−√n))n|1n=1
The Cauchy-Hadamard theorem states simply than the root test applied to the coefficients ⟨an⟩n∈N (in general an∈C for all n∈N) of a given power series ∑∞n=0anxn, determines the values R of the radius of convergence
R=1limn→∞n√an
for which $|x|
How to find the behavior of ∑∞n=0anxn for x=R?
Assuming without loss of generality R=1 (you can always use the transformation x↦Rx and consider a new power series
∑∞n=0ˆanxn with ˆan=anRn for all n∈N), apart from the standard Cauchy convergence criterion which Dèö cites in the comments to his answer, the only necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of power series on the boundary points |x|=1 I am aware of is Tauber's second theorem. In the current situation, it states that the power series is summable and the value of its sum is s± (s+ for x=1 and s− for x=−1; note that the original statement of Tauber considers each boundary point singularly) if and only if
- limz→±1−∑∞n=0anxn=s± and
- a1+2a2+⋯+nan=o(n)∀n∈N+.
However, like Cauchy criterion, this is not easily applicable to real problems: the fulfillment of condition 1 means requiring the series ∑∞n=0an to be Abel summable, while the fulfillment of condition 2 means that the Cesaro mean of its partial sums vanishes as n→∞. Definitely not the easiest properties to check, even if in some case they can be quite effective.
No comments:
Post a Comment