Friday, 17 May 2013

real analysis - uniform continuity and equivalent sequences




Let X be a subset of R, and let f:XR be a function. Then the following two statements are logically equivalent:




(a) f is uniformly continuous on X.



(b) Whenever (xn) and (yn) are two equivalent sequences consisting of elements of X, the sequences (f(xn)) and (f(yn)) are also equivalent.




Proof



First I will state the definitions of uniform continuity and equivalent sequences.





(Uniform continuity). Let X be a subset of R, and let f:XR be a function. We say that f is uniformly continuous if, for every ϵ>0, there exists a δ>0 such that f(x) and f(x0) are ϵ-close whenever x,x0X are to points in X which are δ-close.




.




(Equivalent sequences). Let m be an integer, let (an)n=m and (bn)n=m be two sequences of real numbers, and let ϵ>0 be given. We say that (an)n=m is ϵ-close to (bn)n=m iff an is ϵ-close to bn for each nm. We say that (an) is eventually ϵ-close to (bn) iff there exists an Nm such that the sequences (an) and (bn) are ϵ-close. Two sequences (an) and (bn) are equivalent iff for each ϵ>0, the sequences (an) and (bn) are eventually ϵ-close.




since xX is an adherent point to X, then there exists a sequence (an) such that anX and converges to x. since f is continuous, then the sequence (f(an)) converges to f(x).




Let (bn) be a sequence equivalent to (an). Therefore, ϵ>0,N such that |anbn|ϵ. choose ϵ=δ, then we have |anbn|δnN



Hence, |f(an)f(bn)|ϵ ,nN



hence, (f(an)) and (f(bn)) are equivalent.



Is my proof correct?


Answer



Some remarks concerning your proof:





  • You write:




    Since xX is an adherent point, then there exists a sequence (an) such that anX and converges to x.




    Note that, by definition, we have to consider any two sequences (an)n, (bn)n in X which are equivalent. This means in particular that (an)n need not be convergent and it does not suffices to prove the statement for some sequence (an)n (convergent to x), but we have to prove it for all sequences (an)n (equiavalent to some sequence (bn)n.)


  • You write:





    Choose ϵ=δ.




    In my oppinion, that's not a good formulation - both δ and ϵ are fixed numbers and we cannot simply set ϵ=δ. In this situation it is better two introduce a new variable in the following way:




    Since (an)n and (bn)n are equivalent, ϱ>0NnN:|anbn|ϱ.

    Choose ϱ=δ.









(a) (b) (Corrected version):



Let (an)nN, (bn)nNX be two equivalent sequences and ϵ>0. Since f is uniformly continuous, we can choose δ>0 such that |xy|<δ|f(x)f(y)|<ϵ.

It follows from the very definition of equivalent sequences that ϱ>0NNnN:|anbn|<ϱ.
Choose ϱ=δ. Then |anbn|<δ implies |f(an)f(bn)|<ϵ
by (1) for all nN. Since ϵ>0 is arbitrary, this shows that (f(an))nN and (f(bn))nN are equivalent.



(b) (a):




Suppose that f is not uniformly continuous. Then there exists ϵ>0 such that for any δ>0, we can find x,yX such that |xy|<δand|f(x)f(y)|ϵ.

Choosing δ=1n for nN, we find sequences (xn)nN and (yn)nN such that |xnyn|1nand|f(xn)f(yn)|>ϵ.
Show that (xn)nN and (yn)nN are equivalent and that (f(xn))nN, (f(yn))nN are not equivalent.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...