Given limx→∞(1+1x)x, why can't you reduce it to limx→∞(1+0)x, making the result "1"? Obviously, it's wrong, as the true value is e. Is it because the 1x is still something even though it's really small? Then why is limx→∞(1x)=0?
What is the proper way of calculating the limit in this case?
Answer
Let f(x,y)=(1+y)x. True enough, f(x,0)=1 for every x but this is irrelevant to the limit of f(x,1/x) when x→+∞. Note that one could also consider f(∞,1/x)=∞ for every positive x, as irrelevant as the preceding value 1.
To compute the actual limit of f(x,1/x), several approaches exist. One is to look at logf(x,1/x)=xlog(1+1/x) and to remember that log(1+u)∼u when u→0 hence logf(x,1/x)→1 and f(x,1/x)→e.
To see why log(1+u)∼u when u→0, consider g(u)=log(1+u) and note that g(0)=0 while g′(u)=1/(1+u) hence g′(0)=1 and the Taylor expansion g(u)=g(0)+g′(0)u+o(u) yields the result.
Finally, note that, for every fixed c, f(x,c/x)=(1+c/x)x→ec hence one can realize every positive limit ec by considering the regimes x→+∞, xy→c. The limit 1 is realized if x→+∞ while xy→0 and the limit +∞ if x→+∞ while xy→+∞.
No comments:
Post a Comment