Sunday, 21 September 2014

algebra precalculus - Connection between quadratic equations and complex numbers where Delta>0 (of the quadratic formula)

I recently studied how the complex quadratic equation of x22x+5 was solved:



Solution to <span class=x22x+5">



Then I typed it in for the star of this question:



x22x5



And it used the quadratic formula, which I found boring. So I wondered: what will happen if I use the same method as the image above and just pretend it will have a complex solution. Will the imaginary numbers cancel out? What will happen?




So I did that, and my question is: how did this work so well? What is actually happening here? Is this a complex number thing, or just the fact that I'm splitting x into two components?



Or did I just luck into the solution and actually have a subtle mistake?



Here are the steps I took.



x22x5=0



(a+bi)22(a+bi)5=0




(a2+2abi+b2i2)2a2bi=0



Reordering it to the 'template' of the image. (note: b2i2=b2)



(a2b22a5)+i(2b+2ab)=0



Alright, I'm on the right track as it is intuitive to me that only -5 should be the only changed value.



[a2b22a5=02b+2ab=0]



Here is where I venture of a little bit as my linear algebra is almost non-existent.



2ab2b=0



2ab=2b



2a=2




a=1



Since it's immediately visible what b is in the same equation, I went to the other equation as I figured, it might have more information about b. We already have a believable value for a, so I subtitute it in there.



1221b25=0



b26=0



6=b2




b=6



b=6i or b=6i



And substitute back for x=a+bi we get:



x=1+(±6i)i



x=1+(±6i2)




x=1+(±61)



x=1+(±6)



x=1±6



Wait, that is correct (use the quadratic formula or something like SymPy to check, I use the website above called https://www.symbolab.com/solver/).



How is this possible? How is it possible that if I model this equation with complex numbers, I also get a valid solution? When isn't this possible?

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...