Can someone show me how is possible to prove that
limx→0+sin2xtanx−x3x7=115
but without Taylor series. One can use L'Hospital rule if necessary. I was not able.
Answer
Let the desired limit be denoted by L.
We have via LHR limx→0x−sinxx3=limx→01−cosx3x2=16
limx→0(x−sinx)(tanx−x)sinxx7=118⇒limx→0(xsinxtanx−x2sinx−sin2xtanx+xsin2x)x7=118⇒limx→0xsinxtanx−x2sinx−x3+x3−sin2xtanx+xsin2xx7=118⇒limx→0xsinxtanx−x2sinx+xsin2x−x3x7−sin2xtanx−x3x7=118⇒limx→0sinxtanx−xsinx+sin2x−x2x6−L=118
Our job is done if we can show that limx→0sinxtanx−xsinx+sin2x−x2x6=1190
A=limx→0tanx+2sinx−3xx5=limx→0sec2x+2cosx−35x4 (apply LHR)=limx→01+2cos3x−3cos2x5x4cos2x=15limx→01+2cos3x−3cos2xx4=15limx→0(cosx−1)2(2cosx+1)x4=35limx→0(1−cosxx2)2=35⋅12⋅12=320
Thus the proof is complete by application of LHR three times (once in proof of (1), (2), (8) each). Also note that if you know the result (1) then result (2) can be derived from (1) by subtraction and noting that the limit limx→0tanx−sinxx3
Update: While dealing with limit expressions of type limx→0f(x)/xn for large n (here n=7), I have often found it useful to multiply several well knows limits of type g(x)/xm with smaller values of m to get something like h(x)/xn. Expectation is that some terms of f(x) match with those of h(x) and a subtraction would cancel these terms. Also it is expected that resulting expression will be simplified to p(x)/xr when r<n. Continue this till we get very small values of exponent of x in denominator. Here for example I have reduced an expression with x7 to finally an expression with x5 in denominator. See this technique applied to limx→0xsin(sinx)−sin2xx6
No comments:
Post a Comment