Wednesday, 19 October 2016

Summation operation for precalculus



Studying Spivak's Calculus I came across a relation I find hard to grasp. In particular, I want to understand it without using proofs by induction. So please prove or explain the following relationship by not using induction.



nj=0(nj)anjbj+1=n+1j=1(nj1)an+1jbj



Thanks in advance.



Answer



The identity you've given appears to be an index shift. Instead of beginning to sum at i=0, we wish to begin at 1. In order to advance the summation index ahead by 1, we have to take away 1 from every instance of the index variable inside the summand.



ni=0(ni)anibi+1



The index shift becomes clear if you let j=i+1 and substitute.



=n+1j=0+1(nj1)an(j1)b(j1)+1
=n+1j=1(nj1)anj+1bj


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...