Wednesday, 29 November 2017

combinatorics - Prove sumlimitsni=0binomn+ii=binom2n+1n+1




I'm trying to prove this algebraically: ni=0(n+ii)=(2n+1n+1)



Unfortunately I've been stuck for quite a while. Here's what I've tried so far:





  1. Turning (n+ii) to (n+in)

  2. Turning (2n+1n+1) to (2n+1n)

  3. Converting binomial coefficients to factorial form and seeing if anything can be cancelled.

  4. Writing the sum out by hand to see if there's anything that could be cancelled.



I end up being stuck in each of these ways, though. Any ideas? Is there an identity that can help me?


Answer




Oh, hey! I just figured it out. Funny how simply posting the question allows you re-evaluate the problem differently...



So on Wikipedia apparently this is a thing (the recursive formula for computing the value of binomial coefficients): (nk)=(n1k1)+(n1k)



On the RHS of the equation we have (let's call this equation 1):



(2n+1n+1)=(2nn)+(2n1n)+(2n2n)++(n+1n)+(2n(n1)n+1)
The last term (2n(n1)n+1) simplifies to (n+1n+1) or just 1.



Meanwhile on the LHS we have ni=0(n+ii) which is also ni=0(n+in) because (nk)=(nnk).




Written out that is (let's call this equation 2):
ni=0(n+in)=(nn)+(n+1n)+(n+2n)++(2nn)



The first term (nn) simplifies to 1.



Hey, look at that.



In each written out sum there's a term in equation 1 and an equivalent in equation 2. And in each sum there's n terms, so equation 1 definitely equals equation 2. I mean, the order of terms is flipped, but whatever. Yay!


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...