In Mathematics, we know the following is true:
∫1x dx=ln(x)
Not only that, this rule works for constants added to x:
∫1x+1 dx=ln(x+1)+C3
∫1x+3 dx=ln(x+3)+C
∫1x−37 dx=ln(x−37)+C
∫1x−42 dx=ln(x−42)+C
So its pretty safe to say that ∫1x+a dx=ln(x+a)+C But the moment I introduce xa where a is not equal to 1, the model collapses. The integral of 1/xa is not equal to ln(xa). The same goes for cos(x), and sin(x), and other trig functions.
So when are we allowed or not allowed to use the rule of ln(x) when integrating functions?
Answer
Generally speaking, "using ln(x)" as a rule or technique is unheard of. When one speaks of techniques, they usually include integration by substitution, integration by parts, trig substitutions, partial fractions, etc. With introductory calculus in mind, ln|x| is defined as ∫1x dx. This can be extended to ln|u|=∫1u du. Note that there are many more definitions for ln(x), but I felt this best related particularly to your examples.
For your first couple of examples, when choosing your u to be the denominator, the du is simply equal to dx. This is what 'allows' the integrand to be evaluated to just ln|u| where u is a linear expression.
In regards to ∫1x2+a dx, this can be handled using an inverse tangent and would be evaluated to
arctan(x√a)√a+C
For integrals of the form
∫1xn+a dx
where n≥3, you will have to revert to partial fractions. For more on partial fractions, see this.
No comments:
Post a Comment