Thursday, 31 July 2014

calculus - When am I allowed to use ln(x) when integrating functions?



In Mathematics, we know the following is true:




1x dx=ln(x)



Not only that, this rule works for constants added to x:
1x+1 dx=ln(x+1)+C3
1x+3 dx=ln(x+3)+C
1x37 dx=ln(x37)+C
1x42 dx=ln(x42)+C



So its pretty safe to say that 1x+a dx=ln(x+a)+C But the moment I introduce xa where a is not equal to 1, the model collapses. The integral of 1/xa is not equal to ln(xa). The same goes for cos(x), and sin(x), and other trig functions.




So when are we allowed or not allowed to use the rule of ln(x) when integrating functions?


Answer



Generally speaking, "using ln(x)" as a rule or technique is unheard of. When one speaks of techniques, they usually include integration by substitution, integration by parts, trig substitutions, partial fractions, etc. With introductory calculus in mind, ln|x| is defined as 1x dx. This can be extended to ln|u|=1u du. Note that there are many more definitions for ln(x), but I felt this best related particularly to your examples.



For your first couple of examples, when choosing your u to be the denominator, the du is simply equal to dx. This is what 'allows' the integrand to be evaluated to just ln|u| where u is a linear expression.



In regards to 1x2+a dx, this can be handled using an inverse tangent and would be evaluated to
arctan(xa)a+C




For integrals of the form
1xn+a dx



where n3, you will have to revert to partial fractions. For more on partial fractions, see this.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...