The Jacobi accessory equation has importance as a means of checking candidates for functional extrema. A book of mine ($\textit{Calculus of variations}$, by van Brunt) proves that we can find solutions to the Jacobi accessory equation by differentiating the general solution to the Euler-Lagrange equation; that is, if the latter has a general solution $y$ involving parameters $c_1, c_2$, then the functions
$$u_1(x) = \frac{\partial y}{\partial c_1}, \quad u_2(x) = \frac{\partial y}{\partial c_2}$$
evaluated at some particular $(c_1, c_2)$ are solutions to the Jacobi accessory equation (given basic smoothness assumptions). However, van Brunt goes on to claim without proof that $u_1, u_2$ $\textit{form a basis for the solution space}$. Can anyone suggest how this might be proved?
Friday, 23 January 2015
calculus of variations - Basis for solution space of Jacobi accessory equation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$
How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...
-
Self-studying some properties of the exponential-function I came to the question of ways to assign a value to the divergent sum $$s=\sum_{k=...
-
Ok, according to some notes I have, the following is true for a random variable $X$ that can only take on positive values, i.e $P(X $\int_0^...
-
I use Euclidean Algorithm: 4620 = 101 * 45 + 75. long story short. I get 3 = 2 * 1 + 1. After that 2 = 1 * 2 + 0. gcd(101,4620) = 1. So I us...
No comments:
Post a Comment