Saturday, 17 January 2015

What is wrong in this proof that pi=2 or x=2?



Let us consider the number πππ=πππ=ππ2



As the bases are equal, the exponents must be equal, So π=2



You can take any x instead of π.




What is wrong in this proof?


Answer



Lets write ab to mean ab.



Then the following reasoning is correct: (ππ)π=π(ππ)=π(π2)



However, we cannot necessarily deduce that the RHS equals



(ππ)2




because exponentiation isn't associative. Indeed, Google calculator tells me that:




  • π(π2)80662.6659386


  • (ππ)21329.48908322




so if the calculator is correct to even the first decimal place, then




(ππ)2π(π2).



Moral of the story: if in doubt, find better notation!


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...