Saturday, 24 January 2015

real analysis - Outer measure of a nested sequence of non-measurable sets




Let n=1En=E and EnEn+1 then lim even if each E_n is a non-measurable set, where \mu^* is Lebesgue outer measure. E is a bounded set.Proof sketch please?



This theorem allows the short proofs of Dominated convergence theorem, Vitali Convergence Theorem, Monotone Convergence Theorem , Egorov's theorem and Luzin's theorem without dwelling much on the machinery of measure theory.


Answer



The theorem is true for measurable sets.



Proof for the general case:



There is a subsequence { E_k } such that \mu^* (E_{k+1} ) - \mu^* (E_k ) \le \frac {\epsilon}{2^{k+1}}




Lets first construct such subsequence :



\lim\limits_{n\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_n) \ge \mu^*(E_{n+1}) \ge \mu^*(E_n)



Choose E_1 such that \lim\limits_{n\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_n) -\mu^*(E_1) \le \frac {\epsilon}{2}



Choose E_2 such that E_1 \subseteq E_2 and \lim\limits_{n\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_n) -\mu^*(E_2) \le \frac {\epsilon}{2^3}



Choose E_3 such that E_2 \subseteq E_3 and \lim\limits_{n\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_n) -\mu^*(E_3) \le \frac {\epsilon}{2^4}
Then use induction




Step 1: cover E_k with union of open intervals \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty I_i = L_k
Such that \mu^* (L_k) \le \mu^* (E_k) + \frac {\epsilon}{2^k}



By Caratheodory condition \mu^* (E_{k+1} \bigcap L_k^c ) = \mu^* (E_{k+1} ) - \mu^* (E_{k+1} \bigcap L_k )
\mu^*(E_k) \le \mu^*(E_{k+1} \bigcap L_k ) \le \mu^*(L_k)



Therefore \mu^*(E_{k+1} \bigcap L_k^c ) \le \mu^*(E_{k+1}) - \mu^* (E_k) \le \frac {\epsilon}{2^{k+1}}



Step 2 : Let G_{k+1} = E_{k+1} \bigcap L_k^c




L_k \bigcup G_{k+1} contains E_{k+1}



Now cover L_k \bigcup G_{k+1} with union of intervals \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty I_i = H_{k+1}
Such that \mu^* (H_{k+1}) \le \mu^*( L_k \bigcup G_{k+1}) + \frac {\epsilon}{2^{k+1}}



\mu^* (H_{k+1}) \le \mu^*( L_k) + \mu^*( G_{k+1}) \le \mu^*(E_k) + \frac { \epsilon}{2^k} +\frac { 2\epsilon}{2^{k+1} }



Now using H_{k+1} as the cover for E_{k+1}




As seen \mu^*(E_{k+1}) \le \mu^*(H_{k+1}) \le \mu^*(E_{k+1}) + \frac {\epsilon}{2^k} +\frac {2\epsilon}{2^{k+1}}



Now apply step 1 and 2 to E_{k+1} and E_{k+2} and get :



\mu^*(E_{k+2}) \le \mu^* (H_{k+2}) \le \mu^*(E_{k+2}) + \frac { \epsilon}{2^k} +\frac { 2\epsilon}{2^{k+1} } +\frac { 2\epsilon}{2^{k+2} }



It is obvious E \subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty H_k



H_k \subseteq H_{k+1}




\mu^*(E_{k}) \le \mu^* (H_{k}) \le \mu^*(E_{k}) + 4 \epsilon



Notice that the theorem is valid for H_k as it is a measurable set (union of intervals)
So \lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty} \mu^*(H_k) \ge \mu^*(E)



\lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_{k}) \le \lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty} \mu^*(H_k) \le \lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_{k}) + 4\epsilon



\lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_{k}) \le \mu^*(E) \le \lim\limits_{k\mapsto \infty}\mu^*(E_{k}) + 4\epsilon



Because \epsilon is arbitrary the proof is complete.




Remark: The proof is straight forward for measurable sets but not so for arbitrary sets. Actually it is true and it was given as an exercise in 'The Integrals of Lebesgue, Denjoy , Perron , and Henstock (Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 4 )' by Russell A. Gordon . It is theorem 1.15 in the book.



This theorem allows the short proofs of Dominated convergence theorem, Vitali Convergence Theorem, Monotone Convergence Theorem , Egorov's theorem and Luzin's theorem without dwelling much on the machinery of measure theory.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...