The Following text is not a mathematical proof, yet, it's just a collection of ideas I have.
I need your help to make it a math. proof :)
(fn)n∈N is given by fn:R→R,x→sin(2−nx).
Show that the family (fn)n∈N is linearly independent.
Well.. it seems as if every f_n is zero for x=0.
However, each fn does have a zero-point that fn−1,fn−2,...,f0 do not have in common.
I now took a look at:
C0∗f0+C1∗f1+...+Cn∗fn=0
For this proof I have to show: this equation can only be solved for C0=C1=...=Cn=0.
Well.. With whatever Constant C i multiplicate my function f_n, the zer-point remains the same.
So: let's call the point, where f0,f1,...,fn−1 have a common zero-point (!but fn doesnt!!) N1.
If (fn) would be linearly dependent, then there must be a way to solve
C0+f0+C1+f1+...+Cn∗fn=0 at N1.
So there are actually many ways for C0,...,Cn−1≠0, since all of those functions are 0 at N1, the choice of C doesnt matter.
However: I cannot find a Cn≠0 so that Cn∗fn=0, since fn≠0 at N1
Answer
You have the right idea, but you really want a statement of the opposite type: for each n≥0, the point xn=2n−1π has the property that f0(xn)=⋯=fn−1(xn)=0 but fn(xn)=1.
Now let c0f0(x)+⋯+cnfn(x)=0 be an identically vanishing linear combination of {f0,…,fn. Plugging in xn to both sides, we see that cn=0. Next plugging in xn−1 to both sides, we see that cn−1=0. Continuing in this way, we eventually show that all the cj equal 0. Therefore the set {f0,f1,…} is linearly independent.
No comments:
Post a Comment