real analysis - $f(nx)to 0$ as $nto+infty$

Let $f:\mathbb R^+\to\mathbb R^+$ be a continuous function, and let $I$ be a subset of $\mathbb R^+$ such that the following property holds:

For any $x\in I$, $f(nx)\to 0$ as $n\to+\infty$.

Intuitively, if $I$ is 'big' enough, $f$ necessarily tends to $0$ at infinity, but it happens to not always be the case. I am investigating whether it can be said, for various $I$, if

$f(x)\to 0$ as $x\to+\infty$.

---

As a first example, consider $I=[0,1]$. Set $\varepsilon>0$, and consider the closed sets $F_n=\{x\in I\mid f(kx)<\varepsilon,\forall k\geq n\}$. Their union is $[0,1]$, and thus, thanks to the property of Baire, one of them has non-empty interior, i.e. $[a,b]\in F_n$ for a certain $n$. It follows that for all $k\geq n$ and $x\in[ka,kb]$, $f(x)<\varepsilon$. But since $b>a$, $\bigcup_{k=n}^\infty [ka,kb]$ contains a half-line, and $\limsup_{x\to\infty} f(x) \leq \varepsilon$. Since the reasoning holds for any $\varepsilon>0$, we conclude that $f$ does, indeed, tend to $0$ at infinity. The same proof actually works for all $I$ with non-empty interior.

The result is false in higher dimensions when $I$ contains a neighbourhood of the origin, as a simple counter-example can be constructed using a parabola.

What happens when $I\subset \mathbb R$ is smaller? Consider the following sets:

1. $I$ is any measurable set with empty interior, but with Lebesgue measure >0. In that case, one of the aforementioned $F_n$ has positive Lebesgue measure.





2. $I=(0,1)\cap C$, where $C$ is the Cantor set (or another uncountable set). Then, one of the $F_n$ has to be uncountable aswell,




3. $I=\{1/k,k\in\mathbb N\}$ or $I=(0,1)\cap \mathbb Q$, both of these being equivalent. I provided an answer below for this one, and actually for any countable set; such a function $f$ does not necessarily converge to $0$.

In any of these cases, can anything be said about the behaviour of $f$ at infinity?

Bonus question: what is the minimum condition for $I$ (if there is one) so that $f$ has to converge to $0$?

---

I thought about mimicking the proof of the first example when $I$ has empty interior but positive Lebesgue measure. If there exists an integer $n$ and a non-trivial interval $[a,b]$ such that $|F_n\cap [a,b]|=b-a$, then $f\leq\varepsilon$ on a set that is dense on a half-line, and thus, using continuity, tends to $0$. Sadly, such an interval may not exist, since the closure of $F_n$ could very well be of empty interior, like a generalized Cantor set.

Answer

At the first I remark that your proof works for all non-meager $I$ (that is which are not a countable union of nowhere dense sets). From the other hand, let $I$ be a meager subset of $\mathbb R^+$. Choose a sequence $\{F_n\}$ of closed nowhere dense sets such that $F_n\subset [1/n;n]$ for each $n$ and $\bigcup F_n\cup \{0\}\supset I$. The family $\mathcal F=\{mF_n:m\ge n^2\}$ is locally finite, so a set $F=\bigcup\mathcal F$ is closed. Since the set $F$ is meager, by Baire theorem, it does not contain a half-line. This means there exists a sequence $S=\{x_n\}\subset\mathbb R^+\setminus\{0\}$ which goes to infinity. Thus the set $S$ is closed. Since the closed sets $F\cup\{0\}$ and $S$ are disjoint and the space $\mathbb R^+$ is normal, there exists a continuous function $f: \mathbb R^+\to \mathbb R^+$ such that $f(F\cup\{0\})=0$ and $f(S)=1$. Therefore there exists arbitrary large $x$ such that $f(x)=1$, but for each $x\in I$ $f(nx)$ eventually gets $0$.