I know that the partial sums of ∞∑n=1sin(n)
are bounded between cos(12)−12sin(12) and 1+cos(12)2sin(12).
On the other hand, the partial sums of
∞∑n=1sin(√n)
are unbounded.
I think that the partial sums of ∑∞n=1sin(na) are bounded for a≥1 and unbounded for 0<a<1, but how can I prove this? I think this question involves Euler-Maclaurin sum.
Answer
∙ a>1 is an integer
If a>1 is an integer, then this post in MO by Terry Tao solves that the partial sums are not bounded.
∙ a>1 is not an integer
If a>1 is not an integer, the same argument by Terry Tao still works, since we have equidistribution of na mod 2π, and any sum or difference of (n+i)a with 1≤i≤h modulo 2π. Let Xi be the random variable sina(k+i) where k=1,…n. Assuming the boundedness of partial sums, we end up having a contradiction that the random variables X1,…,Xh such that Var(X1+⋯+Xh) is bounded as h→∞ by assumption, but Var(X1+⋯+Xh)∼h/2 as h→∞.
The first part of this answer of mine, shows that $\sum_{\alpha
For a better estimate, we apply Lemma 4.8 of The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-function written by Titchmarsh.
Let f(x) be a real differentiable function in the interval [a,b], let f′(x) be monotonic, and let |f′(x)|≤θ<1. Then
$$
\sum_{a$$
Taking imaginary part from the lemma and f(n)=na/(2π), we have
∑n≤Nsin(na)=∫N1−sin(xa) dx+O(1).
The change of variable xa=t gives
∫N1−sin(xa) dx=∫Na1−1at1a−1sint dt.
Applying the integration by parts to the last integral, we obtain an estimate of
−1aN1−acos(Na)+O(Nmax
This expression is clearly unbounded. Therefore, the partial sums are unbounded when $0, and a>1.
No comments:
Post a Comment