From "Fundamentals of Number Theory" by William J. LeVeque:
Mn=2n−1.
Show that if n=rs, Mr divides Mn.
My proof is:
(Mn=2n−1)+(n=rs)=>(Mrs=2rs−1)=>(Mrs=(2r)s−1)
(Mr=2r−1)=>(Mr+1=2r)
Mrs=(Mr+1)s−1
In the expansion of (Mr+1)s, all components are of the form MrX, except for the product of all ones. This follows from the combinatorial constraints. Therefore Mn is of the form
Mn=Mrs=Mr(X1+X2+...)+1−1.
Thus Mr|Mn.
I have two questions:
1) Is this proof correct/acceptable?
2) In what other ways can this problem be solved? Specifically I am interested in what other kinds of algebraic/logical/mathematical manipulations could be used.
Thanks in advance!
Answer
Note fn:= an−1 = an−m(am−1)+an−m−1, i.e. fn=k fm+fn−m≡fn−m(modfm) so
THEOREM Let fn be an integer sequence with f0=0 and fn≡fn−m (mod fm) for n>m. Then (fn,fm) = f(n,m) where (i,j) denotes gcd(i,j).
Proof By induction on n+m. The theorem is trivially true if n=m or n=0 or m=0.
So we may assume n>m>0. Note (fn,fm)= (fn−m,fm) follows from the hypothesis.
Since (n−m)+m < n+m, induction yields (fn−m,fm) = f(n−m,m) = f(n,m) QED
In particular (MR,MRS)=M(R,RS)=MR so MR|MRS
See also this post for a conceptual proof exploiting the innate structure - an order ideal, and look up divisibility sequence to learn more about the essence of the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment