Tuesday, 26 February 2019

number theory - Proving amidb2,,b2mida3,,a3midb4,ldotsimpliesa=b - why is my approach incorrect



https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/704048/theory-number-problems

After I saw that post i wanted to solve the first one which is
ab2,b2a3,a3b4,b4a5 Prove that a=b



Now i started by proving that a and b have same prime divisors,proving that is trivial,after doing so I checked do those factors have to have the same power.I tried with
a=p2,b=p3


I noticed it exactly goes for 3 terms,or that a3b4
doing a=pn1,b=pnpn1p2np2np3n3p3n3p4np4np5n5pn(n1)pn(n1)pn(n1)pn(n+1)pn(n+1)p(n1)(n+1)

Now yeah I guess that would be a proof,but wouldn't setting n=n+1 infinitely many times make every term dividable?


Answer



Hint  b(b/a),b(b/a)3,b(b/a)5 are all integers, i.e. b is a common denominator for unbounded powers of b/a, hence b/a, is an integer (prove this!), therefore ab. Similarly ba.




Further hint: let r=ba=cd, (c,d)=1. Then brk=nZbck=ndk so dkbckdkb by Euclid's Lemma and (c,d)=1. dkb for unbounded k d=±1, so r=cd=±cZ.



Remark   The above property, that unbounded powers of proper fractions cannot have a common denominator (such as b above), is a special property of Z that needn't be true in general domains. When it holds true, a domain is called completely integrally closed.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...