The book Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbott asserts that
g(x)=∞∑n=012nh(2nx),
where h(x)=|x|, h:[−1,1]→R, and h(x+2)=h(x), is continuous on all of R but fails to be differentiable at any point.
However, if I am not mistaken, can the 2n's be cancelled out in g? I tried plotting this and could not obtain a nowhere-differentiable function.
Answer
The plot looks like this. It's hard to tell by a casual look that this is nowhere differentiable.
For a better view of what's going on, here's an animation that zooms into the graph. You can see that the picture looks similar at different length scales. A differentiable curve, on the other hand, would look more and more like a straight line as you zoomed in.
EDIT: I plotted this in Maple. I don't have the code any more, but it might have been something like this.
h:= x -> abs(x - 2*round(x/2)):
g:= unapply(add(1/2^n*h(2^n*x), n=0..1000),x):
x0:= 0.23456: y0:= evalf(g(x0)): r:= 1.13:
for i from 0 to 99 do
frame[i]:= plot(r^i*(g(x/r^i + x0) - y0), x=-1..1, axes=none,
title = sprintf("Zoom factor %7.1f",r^i))
od:
plots[display]([seq(frame[i],i=0..99)],insequence=true);
No comments:
Post a Comment