Sunday, 13 October 2013

number theory - Generalized Pythagorean triples construction.



All primitive Pythagorean triples (a,b,c):{a2+b2=c2}{a0(mod2)} can be expressed in the form:{a=2pq,b=p2q2,c=p2+q2} for positive integers p,q:{gcd.







I conjectured that this also holds for imprimitive Pythagorean triples (in this case p,q are not necessarily relatively prime and of opposite parity).



However, I could not find any counterexamples and currently I am stuck in the developing of a proof.



That is why I am appealing to you. I would really appreciate any counterexamples, proofs, ideas, etc.



Thank you.



Answer



Sadly, it's not true for the general case. Easiest counterexample is to take the 3-4-5 right triangle and multiply each side by 3. 15 cannot be written as the sum of 2 squares. The sum of 2 squares cannot be congruent to 3\pmod4.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...