In Baby Rudin, Theorem 3.27 on page 61 reads the following:
Suppose a1≥a2≥a3≥⋯≥0. Then the seires ∑∞n=1an converges if and only if the series
∞∑k=02ka2k=a1+2a2+4a4+8a8+… converges.
Now using this result, Rudin gives Theorem 3.29 on page 62, which states that
If p>1, ∞∑n=21n(logn)p converges; if p≤1, the series diverges.
Right after the proof of Theorem 3.29, Rudin states on page 63:
This procedure may evidently be continued. For instance, ∞∑n=31nlognloglogn diverges, whereas ∞∑n=31nlogn(loglogn)2 converges.
How do we derive these last two divergence and convergence conclusions
by continuing the above procedure as pointed out by Rudin?
I mean how to prove the convergence of the seires
∞∑n=31nlogn(loglogn)2?
And, how to prove the divergence of ∞∑n=31nlognloglogn using the line of argument suggested by Rudin?
No comments:
Post a Comment