Let an>0 for n∈N. The convergence radius of the series ∑∞n=0anzn is 1q with q=limn→∞n√an or q=limn→∞an+1an, if these limits exist. Therefore the lims must be identical.
However I was wondering whether there exists a more elementary way to show this identity? (Or generally any other way?)
Answer
The general relation is
lim infn→∞an+1an≤lim infn→∞n√(an≤lim supn→∞n√(an≤lim supn→∞an+1an(*)
provided that all an are positive. It follows that if
limn→∞an+1an exists then
limn→∞n√(an exists as well and they are equal.
To prove the rightmost inequality, define S:=lim supn→∞an+1an. For every ϵ>0 there is a N∈N
such that
an+1an<S+ϵ for n≥N.
⟹an<aN(S+ϵ)n−N for n≥N
⟹n√(an<(S+ϵ)n√aN(S+ϵ)−N
⟹lim supn→∞n√(an≤S+ϵ.
The leftmost inequality can be proved in the same way, or by taking
the reciprocals.
That the convergence radius R of a power series ∑∞n=0anzn can be
determined with the root test or
with the ratio test
is a consequence of the above relation (*), not the other way around.
But note that the tests are slighty different:
1R=lim supn→∞n√(|an|
holds even if the limit does not exists.
1R=limn→∞|an+1an|
is only valid if the limit on the right-hand side exists. You cannot
generally replace the lim by lim sup in the ratio test.
No comments:
Post a Comment