I used the result 2πexp(−z2)∞∫0exp(−z2x2)1x2+1dx=erfc(z)
Addendum
Expanding @Jack D'Aurizio's solution, we have
2πe−z2∞∫0e−z2x2x2+1dx=2zπe−z2∞∫0e−t2z2+t2dt=zπe−z2∞∫−∞e−t2z2+t2dt
we used the substitution x=t/z.
For the integral
∞∫−∞e−t2z2+t2dt
we let f(t)=e−t2 and g(t)=1/(z2+t2) and take Fourier transforms of each,
F(s)=F[f(t)]=e−s2/4√2
and
G(s)=F[g(t)]=1z√π2e−z|s|
then invoke Parseval's theorem
∞∫−∞f(t)¯g(t)dt=∞∫−∞F(s)¯G(s)ds
dropping constants, the integral becomes
∞∫−∞e−s2/4e−z|s|ds=2∞∫0e−s2/4e−z|s|ds=2ez2∞∫0e−(s+2z)2/4ds=4ez2∞∫0e−y2dy=2√πez2erfc(z)
We completed the square in the exponent and used the substitution y=z+s/2.
Putting the pieces together yields our desired result
2πe−z2∞∫0e−z2x2x2+1dx=zπe−z2∞∫−∞e−t2z2+t2dt=zπe−z21√21z√π22√πez2erfc(z)=erfc(z)
Answer
With the substitution x=tz, the integral on the left becomes
I=2πzez2∫+∞0e−t21+t2z2dt=1πzez2∫+∞−∞e−t21+t2z2dt
and we may switch to Fourier transforms. Since
F(e−t2)=1√2e−s2/4,F(11+t2z2)=z√π2e−z|s|
I boils down to an integral of the form ∫+∞0exp(−(s−ξ)2)ds that is straightforward to convert in a expression involving the (complementary) error function.
As an alternative, you may use differentiation under the integral sign to prove that both sides of your equation fulfill the same differential equation with the same initial constraints, then invoke the uniqueness part of the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem:
ddzLHS=−2π∫+∞02ze−z2(x2+1)dx,ddzRHS=−2√πe−z2.
We have ddz(LHS−RHS)=0, and (LHS−RHS)(0)=1.
An interesting consequence is the following (tight) approximation for the erfc function:
erfc(z)=2e−z2π∫+∞0e−z2x2x2+1dx≤2e−z2π∫+∞0dx(x2+1)(x2z2+1)=1(1+z)ez2.
No comments:
Post a Comment