Wednesday, 10 July 2013

integration - Show frac2pimathrmexp(z2)intinfty0mathrmexp(z2x2)frac1x2+1mathrmdx=mathrmerfc(z)



I used the result 2πexp(z2)0exp(z2x2)1x2+1dx=erfc(z)

to answer this MSE question. As I mentioned in the link, I obtained this result from the DLMF. I happened to find this solution after failing to evaluate the integral using a variety of substitutions. A solution would be appreciated.



Addendum



Expanding @Jack D'Aurizio's solution, we have



2πez20ez2x2x2+1dx=2zπez20et2z2+t2dt=zπez2et2z2+t2dt


we used the substitution x=t/z.



For the integral
et2z2+t2dt


we let f(t)=et2 and g(t)=1/(z2+t2) and take Fourier transforms of each,

F(s)=F[f(t)]=es2/42

and
G(s)=F[g(t)]=1zπ2ez|s|

then invoke Parseval's theorem
f(t)¯g(t)dt=F(s)¯G(s)ds

dropping constants, the integral becomes



es2/4ez|s|ds=20es2/4ez|s|ds=2ez20e(s+2z)2/4ds=4ez20ey2dy=2πez2erfc(z)


We completed the square in the exponent and used the substitution y=z+s/2.



Putting the pieces together yields our desired result
2πez20ez2x2x2+1dx=zπez2et2z2+t2dt=zπez2121zπ22πez2erfc(z)=erfc(z)



Answer



With the substitution x=tz, the integral on the left becomes



I=2πzez2+0et21+t2z2dt=1πzez2+et21+t2z2dt


and we may switch to Fourier transforms. Since
F(et2)=12es2/4,F(11+t2z2)=zπ2ez|s|

I boils down to an integral of the form +0exp((sξ)2)ds that is straightforward to convert in a expression involving the (complementary) error function.



As an alternative, you may use differentiation under the integral sign to prove that both sides of your equation fulfill the same differential equation with the same initial constraints, then invoke the uniqueness part of the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem:
ddzLHS=2π+02zez2(x2+1)dx,ddzRHS=2πez2.



We have ddz(LHSRHS)=0, and (LHSRHS)(0)=1.






An interesting consequence is the following (tight) approximation for the erfc function:



erfc(z)=2ez2π+0ez2x2x2+1dx2ez2π+0dx(x2+1)(x2z2+1)=1(1+z)ez2.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...