Thursday, 25 July 2013

real analysis - Partial sums of exponential series



What is known about f(k)=k1n=0knn! for large k?



Obviously it is is a partial sum of the series for ek -- but this partial sum doesn't reach close to ek itself because we're cutting off the series right at the largest terms. In the full series, the (k+i1)th term is always at least as large as the (ki)th term for 1ik, so f(k)<ek/2. Can we estimate more precisely how much smaller than ek the function is?



It would look very nice and pleasing if, say, f(k)ek1 for large k, but I have no real evidence for that hypothesis.




(Inspired by this question and my answer thereto).


Answer



This appears as problem #96 in Donald J Newman's excellent book: A Problem Seminar.



The problem statement there is:




Show that




1+n1!+n22!++nnn!en2




Where anbn mean limanbn=1.



Thus we can estimate your sum (I have swapped n and k) as



1+n1!+n22!++nn1(n1)!en2




as by Stirling's formula, nnn!en0.



The solution in the book proceeds as follows:



The remainder term for a the Taylor Series of a function f is



Rn(x)=x0(xt)nn!fn+1(t) dt



which for our purposes, comes out as




n0(nt)nn!et dt



Making the substitution nt=x gives us the integral



n0xnn!ex dx



In an earlier problem (#94), he shows that



0(1+xn)nex dxπn2




which using the substitution n+x=t gives



ntnet dtnnenπn2



Using 0xnex dx=n! and Stirling's formula now gives the result.



To prove that



0(1+xn)nex dxπn2




He first makes the substitution x=nt to obtain



0(1+xn)nex dx =n0(1+tn)nent dt



Now (1+tn)nent(1+t)et

and thus by the dominated convergence theorem,



limn1n0(1+xn)nex dx



=0(limn(1+tn)nent) dt




=0et2/2 dt=π2


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...