I have a theory that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the statement that sets of distinct cardinals are well ordered by cardinality. I can prove that the axiom of choice implies this. However I am having trouble proving the other way. I want to prove, without choice, that any set is in bijection with a set of distinct cardinals. I don't know if this is true, but if it is could someone provide a proof for me? Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$
How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...
-
How can one proof the equality $$\sum\limits_{v=0}^k \frac{k^v}{v!}=\sum\limits_{v=0}^k \frac{v^v (k-v)^{k-v}}{v!(k-v)!}$$ for $k\in\mathbb{...
-
Good evening, I have a question concerning the euclidean algorithm. One knows that for $a_1 , \ldots , a_n \in \mathbb{N} $ and $k\in \mathb...
-
$$ 3x+6y+5z=7 $$ The general solution to this linear Diophantine equation is as described here (Page 7-8) is: $$ x = 5k+2l+14 $$ $$ y = -l $...
No comments:
Post a Comment